On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 03:55:47PM +0000, Alan Tull wrote:
>> From: Jamie Iles <jamie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> The Synopsys DesignWare block is used in some ARM devices (picoxcell)
>> and can be configured to provide multiple banks of GPIO pins.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jamie Iles <jamie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Alan Tull <atull@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Reviewed-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> v10: - in documentation nr-gpio -> nr-gpios
>> v9: - cleanup in dt bindings doc
>> - use of_get_child_count()
>> v8: - remove socfpga.dtsi changes
>> - minor cleanup in devicetree documentation
>> v7: - use irq_generic_chip
>> - support one irq per gpio line or one irq for many
>> - s/bank/port/ and other cleanup
>> v6: - (atull) squash the set of patches
>> - use linear irq domain
>> - build fixes. Original driver was reviewed on v3.2.
>> - Fix setting irq edge type for 'rising' and 'both'.
>> - Support as a loadable module.
>> - Use bgpio_chip's spinlock during register access.
>> - Clean up register names to match spec
>> - s/bank/port/ because register names use the word 'port'
>> - s/nr-gpio/nr-gpios/
>> - don't get/put the of_node
>> - remove signoffs/acked-by's because of changes
>> - other cleanup
>> v5: - handle sparse bank population correctly
>> v3: - depend on rather than select IRQ_DOMAIN
>> - split IRQ support into a separate patch
>> v2: - use Rob Herring's irqdomain in generic irq chip patches
>> - use reg property to indicate bank index
>> - support irqs on both edges based on LinusW's u300 driver
>> ---
>> .../devicetree/bindings/gpio/snps-dwapb-gpio.txt | 59 +++
>> drivers/gpio/Kconfig | 9 +
>> drivers/gpio/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c | 415 ++++++++++++++++++++
>> 4 files changed, 484 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/snps-dwapb-gpio.txt
>> create mode 100644 drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/snps-dwapb-gpio.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/snps-dwapb-gpio.txt
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..cb01f9f
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/snps-dwapb-gpio.txt
>> @@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
>> +* Synopsys DesignWare APB GPIO controller
>> +
>> +Required properties:
>> +- compatible : Should contain "snps,dw-apb-gpio"
>> +- reg : Address and length of the register set for the device
>
> Presumably #address-cells and #size-cells should be described here?
>
>> +
>> +The GPIO controller has a configurable number of ports, each of which are
>> +represented as child nodes with the following properties:
>> +
>> +Required properties:
>> +- compatible : "snps,dw-apb-gpio-port"
>> +- gpio-controller : Marks the device node as a gpio controller.
>> +- #gpio-cells : Should be two. The first cell is the pin number and
>> + the second cell is used to specify optional parameters (currently
>> + unused).
>
> Why not just have this as one cell for now if the second cell is unused?
>
> If it needs to be expanded the driver can read #gpio-cells to figure out
> what to do at runtime, and it prevents crap DTSs in the mean time that
> could get in the way if you need to use additional cells in future.
>
>> +- reg : The integer port index of the port, a single cell.
>> +- #address-cells : should be 1.
>> +- #size-cells : should be 0.
>
> As mentioned above, presumably #address-cells and #size-cells should be
> in the parent node, as is the case in the example?
>
>> +
>> +Optional properties:
>> +- interrupt-controller : The first port may be configured to be an interrupt
>> +controller.
>> +- #interrupt-cells : Specifies the number of cells needed to encode an
>> +interrupt. Shall be set to 2. The first cell defines the interrupt number,
>> +the second encodes the triger flags encoded as described in
>> +Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupts.txt
>> +- interrupt-parent : The parent interrupt controller.
>> +- interrupts : The interrupts to the parent controller raised when GPIOs
>> +generate the interrupts.
>
> How many are expected?
>
> Otherwise, the binding looks ok to me.
>
> [...]
>
>> +static void dwapb_configure_irqs(struct dwapb_gpio *gpio,
>> + struct dwapb_gpio_port *port)
>> +{
>> + struct gpio_chip *gc = &port->bgc.gc;
>> + struct device_node *node = gc->of_node;
>> + struct irq_chip_generic *irq_gc;
>> + unsigned int hwirq, ngpio = gc->ngpio;
>> + struct irq_chip_type *ct;
>> + int reg, err, irq;
>> +
>> + if (of_get_property(node, "interrupts", ®) == NULL)
>> + return;
>
> of_get_property can take a NULL lenp (core OF code depends on this
> fact), so you don't need the somewhat confusing ® here.
>
> Cheers,
> Mark.
Hi Mark,
Thanks for the feedback. I have made the changes in v11, which I just sent out.
Alan Tull
aka
delicious quinoa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
