Hi Rob,
On 12/21/2017 2:48 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 11:55:33AM +0530, Sricharan R wrote:
>> Hi Viresh,
>>
>> On 12/20/2017 8:56 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>>> On 19-12-17, 21:25, Sricharan R wrote:
>>>> + cpu@0 {
>>>> + compatible = "qcom,krait";
>>>> + enable-method = "qcom,kpss-acc-v1";
>>>> + device_type = "cpu";
>>>> + reg = <0>;
>>>> + qcom,acc = <&acc0>;
>>>> + qcom,saw = <&saw0>;
>>>> + clocks = <&kraitcc 0>;
>>>> + clock-names = "cpu";
>>>> + cpu-supply = <&smb208_s2a>;
>>>> + operating-points-v2 = <&cpu_opp_table>;
>>>> + };
>>>> +
>>>> + qcom,pvs {
>>>> + qcom,pvs-format-a;
>>>> + };
>>>
>>> Not sure what Rob is going to say on that :)
>>>
>>
>> Yes. Would be good to know the best way.
>
> Seems like this should be a property of an efuse node either implied by
> the compatible or a separate property. What determines format A vs. B?
>
Yes, this efuse registers are part of the eeprom (qfprom) tied to the soc.
So this property (details like bitfields and register offsets that it represents)
can be put soc specific and nvmem apis can be used to read
the registers. Does something like below look ok ?
qcom,pvs {
compatible = "qcom,pvs-ipq8064";
nvmem-cells = <&pvs_efuse>;
}
qfprom: qfprom@700000 {
compatible = "qcom,qfprom";
reg = <0x00700000 0x1000>;
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <1>;
ranges;
pvs_efuse: pvs {
reg = <0xc0 0x8>;
};
};
Regards,
Sricharan
--
"QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
