On 12/14, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> Hi Stephen, Michael,
>
> On 12/01/2017 01:07 PM, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> > The ethsys registers a reset controller, so we need to specify a
> > reset cell. This patch fixes the documentation.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,ethsys.txt | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,ethsys.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,ethsys.txt
> > index 7aa3fa167668..6cc7840ff37a 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,ethsys.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,ethsys.txt
> > @@ -20,4 +20,5 @@ ethsys: clock-controller@1b000000 {
> > compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-ethsys", "syscon";
> > reg = <0 0x1b000000 0 0x1000>;
> > #clock-cells = <1>;
> > + #reset-cells = <1>;
> > };
> >
>
> Will you take this patch through the clk tree, or shall I take it through my SoC
> tree?
>
It's resets, we are clk maintainers. I'm clkfused.
You can take it, along with my
Acked-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
if you like/expect conflicts.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
