Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: pcm512x: Add PCM512x driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 02/06/2014 01:26 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
[...]
+static const char *pcm512x_dsp_program_texts[] = {

Nitpick: should be "static const char * const ...", a immutable array of pointers pointing to immutable strings. Same for all the enum texts in this driver.
[...]
+static int __init pcm512x_modinit(void)
+{
+	int ret = 0;
+
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_I2C)
+	ret = i2c_add_driver(&pcm512x_i2c_driver);
+	if (ret) {
+		printk(KERN_ERR "Failed to register pcm512x I2C driver: %d\n",
+		       ret);
+	}
+#endif
+#if defined(CONFIG_SPI_MASTER)
+	ret = spi_register_driver(&pcm512x_spi_driver);
+	if (ret != 0) {
+		printk(KERN_ERR "Failed to register pcm512x SPI driver: %d\n",
+		       ret);
+	}
+#endif

Another reason why I think it is better to separate the I2C and SPI bits into different modules. If the registration of the SPI driver fails you'll return an error and the module will not be loaded. At the same time the i2c driver is already registered. I know that this is rather theoretical, but if we don't care if our error handling is correct, because we assume that the error will never happen, we do not need error handling at all.

+	return ret;
+}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux