On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 1:46 PM, Mathieu Malaterre <malat@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Improve the DTS files by removing all the leading "0x" and zeros to fix the
>> following dtc warnings:
>>
>> Warning (unit_address_format): Node /XXX unit name should not have leading "0x"
>>
>> and
>>
>> Warning (unit_address_format): Node /XXX unit name should not have leading 0s
>>
>> Converted using the following command:
>>
>> find . -type f \( -iname *.dts -o -iname *.dtsi \) -exec sed -i -e "s/@\([0-9a-fA-FxX\.;:#]+\)\s*{/@\L\1 {/g" -e "s/@0x\(.*\) {/@\1 {/g" -e "s/@0+\(.*\) {/@\1 {/g" {} +^C
>>
>> For simplicity, two sed expressions were used to solve each warnings separately.
>>
>> To make the regex expression more robust a few other issues were resolved,
>> namely setting unit-address to lower case, and adding a whitespace before the
>> the opening curly brace:
>>
>> https://elinux.org/Device_Tree_Linux#Linux_conventions
>>
>> This will solve as a side effect warning:
>>
>> Warning (simple_bus_reg): Node /XXX@<UPPER> simple-bus unit address format error, expected "<lower>"
>>
>> This is a follow up to commit 4c9847b7375a ("dt-bindings: Remove leading 0x from bindings notation")
>>
>> Reported-by: David Daney <ddaney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Suggested-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Ack was for different patchset, touching only three files...
So sorry, when I read your email:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/12/15/152
I assumed you meant for all the Exynos* and S3C* DTS files, but I did
not check carefully which files were touched originally.
>> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi | 34 ++++++------
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4.dtsi | 56 +++++++++----------
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi | 8 +--
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412-pinctrl.dtsi | 2 +-
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412.dtsi | 22 ++++----
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi | 22 ++++----
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi | 64 +++++++++++-----------
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5260.dtsi | 26 ++++-----
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi | 78 +++++++++++++--------------
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroid-core.dtsi | 2 +-
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi | 14 ++---
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/s3c2416.dtsi | 8 +--
>> 12 files changed, 168 insertions(+), 168 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi
>> index 2bd3872221a1..8d47571b3984 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi
>> @@ -164,31 +164,31 @@
>> syscon = <&pmu_system_controller>;
>> };
>>
>> - pd_cam: cam-power-domain@10023C00 {
>> + pd_cam: cam-power-domain@10023c00 {
>
> This is not related to this patch and it was not present in the
> version I acked. I also already fixed this here:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10113323/
>
> There is no changelog explaining the difference in patches. Original
> patch was okay, why changing it?
Accept my sincere apologizes I really messed this series. I discover
my original ARM patch did not apply lower case to all unit-address
equally, so I added at last minute a sed expression to make all
unit-address lower case.
I guess you can just drop this one for now.
-M
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
