On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 10:54 PM, Ard Biesheuvel
<ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 12 December 2017 at 17:15, <jassisinghbrar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
....
>> +
>> +static int netsec_netdev_load_microcode(struct netsec_priv *priv)
>> +{
>> + int err;
>> +
>> + err = netsec_netdev_load_ucode_region(
>> + priv, NETSEC_REG_DMAC_HM_CMD_BUF,
>> + le32_to_cpup(priv->eeprom_base + NETSEC_EEPROM_HM_ME_ADDRESS_H),
>> + le32_to_cpup(priv->eeprom_base + NETSEC_EEPROM_HM_ME_ADDRESS_L),
>> + le32_to_cpup(priv->eeprom_base + NETSEC_EEPROM_HM_ME_SIZE));
>
> ... here, and in other places below, you are still dereferencing
> eeprom_base as if it is a pointer, which is not allowed with in the
> __iomem address space. This should use readl() instead [which happens
> to incorporate the endian swap as well]
>
Ahh, how could it have been just two revisions!
thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
