On Wednesday 05 February 2014, Michal Simek wrote: > On 02/05/2014 10:36 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Wednesday 05 February 2014, Michal Simek wrote: > > Still, the choice of putting the timeout into DT in terms of > > cycles rather than miliseconds wasn't ideal from an interface > > perspective and we should change that if/when we do a generic > > binding. I can definitely see where it's coming from for your > > case, as the cycle count totally makes sense from an FPGA > > tool perspective... > > Thanks. I take this like ACK for this current binding description. > Yes, please add my 'Acked-by'. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
