Am Mittwoch, 5. Februar 2014, 12:06:52 schrieb Grant Likely: > On Tue, 04 Feb 2014 19:48:17 +0100, Heiko Stübner <heiko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Grant, > > > > On Tuesday, 4. February 2014 17:30:34 Grant Likely wrote: > > > On Sat, 18 Jan 2014 09:07:30 -0600, Rob Herring <robherring2@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > wrote: > > > > On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 6:02 AM, Heiko St�¼bner <heiko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > The need to know the number of array elements in a property is > > > > > a common pattern. To prevent duplication of open-coded > > > > > implementations > > > > > add a helper static function that also centralises strict sanity > > > > > checking and DTB format details, as well as a set of wrapper > > > > > functions > > > > > for u8, u16, u32 and u64. > > > > > > > > > > Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > Looks good. Do you plan to convert some users to use this? > > > > > > I'll take that as an acked-by. Merged, thanks. > > > > before you taking this patch, I was planning on simply sending this as > > part of my rockchip-smp series - as I'm currently the only user of it :-) > > . > > > > This going through your tree is most likely the better way, but now I need > > it to somehow make its way into arm-soc too ... I guess some sort of > > stable branch arm-soc could pull? > > Nah, I'll drop it from my tree. Add my acked-by and merge it via > arm-soc. As I said on IRC, now it seems like you can keep this patch in your tree :-) If we're really going with reserved-memory like you suggested in the rockchip- smp series it removes the need to count u32-elements in a property for me, as the reserved blocks move into individual subnodes. Heiko -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
