On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 11:48:43AM -0600, Andrew F. Davis wrote: > That would be unreasonable I agree, but it's also completely > hypothetical, as again, there are no in-tree users and most platforms > are DT/ACPI, so the odds of anyone needing it are next to nothing. You're removing support for something someone might want to use for no clear gain. The bar for doing that needs to be higher than just random cleanup, it needs to actively bring some benefit that justifies the cost. If something is sitting there not getting in the way and is potentially going to be helpful for something in the future then there needs to be a positive reason to take it away.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
