On 12/01, Jerome Brunet wrote: > On Fri, 2017-12-01 at 08:34 -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > On 11/30, Yixun Lan wrote: > > > Hi Stephen > > > > > > On 11/30/17 03:35, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > > > > > > > Maybe just call the node "bus@ff63c000"? > > > > > > > > > > isn't this just a name? what's the benefits to change? > > > personally, I tend to keep it this way, because it's better map to the > > > data sheet > > > > > > we also has 'aobus', 'cbus' scattered there.. > > > > Per the ePAPR node names are supposed to be generic, like disk, > > cpu, display-controller, gpu, etc. I've never heard of a hiubus, > > so probably it's some vendor specific thing? We have the phandle > > anyway so it's not like we're losing much information here. > > Stephen, there is a lot of busses on platform. We can't just call them all > 'bus'. > I don't get the problem with this name. > We are re-using the name from the datasheet here, no fancy invention. It seems > to be quite common. > Ok. I'm not the maintainer of the DTS so no worries from me. I'm just pointing out that the ePAPR says that node names should be generic, and 'hiubus' doesn't sound generic to me. If it matches some datasheet then I suppose that's good, but probably that sort of distinction should have gone into the compatible string instead of the node name. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
