On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 09:58:42AM +0100, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote: > On 12/02/2017 04:09 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > Mark, given this set is moderately invasive on the IIO side and > > should just drop in cleanly on the sound side of things, either > > I could take it via IIO or one of us can do an immutable branch > > and we take it through both trees. > Don't know if you saw the reply from Mark on V5: > "This is basically fine, if someone could send me a pull request and the > relevant patches when the IIO stuff is sorted out I'll give it a final > check and apply then." Yup, I figure that a shared branch with the IIO changes in will be the easiest thing (Morimoto-san is donig a bunch of subsystem wide ASoC cleanups ATM).
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
