Hi Fabio, On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 09:28:08AM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote: > Hi Gary, > > On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 9:19 AM, Gary Bisson > <gary.bisson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > What about naming it i2c2mux and i2c3mux so it is clearer those mux > > happen respectively for i2c2 and i2c3? > > > > Then I'd rename the sub-nodes i2cXmux@Y instead of i2cX@Y currently. > > > > Let me know your thoughts. > > Is this what you suggest? Yes exactly, I find it clearer, what do you think? Regards, Gary -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
