On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 03:09:33PM -0800, David Daney wrote:
> On 11/30/2017 02:56 PM, James Hogan wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 01:49:43PM -0800, David Daney wrote:
> >> On 11/30/2017 01:36 PM, James Hogan wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 04:55:34PM -0800, David Daney wrote:
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Carlos Munoz <cmunoz@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.daney@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> arch/mips/cavium-octeon/setup.c | 6 ++++++
> >>>> arch/mips/include/asm/octeon/octeon.h | 12 ++++++++++--
> >>>> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/setup.c b/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/setup.c
> >>>> index a8034d0dcade..99e6a68bc652 100644
> >>>> --- a/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/setup.c
> >>>> +++ b/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/setup.c
> >>>> @@ -609,6 +609,12 @@ void octeon_user_io_init(void)
> >>>> #else
> >>>> cvmmemctl.s.cvmsegenak = 0;
> >>>> #endif
> >>>> + if (OCTEON_IS_OCTEON3()) {
> >>>> + /* Enable LMTDMA */
> >>>> + cvmmemctl.s.lmtena = 1;
> >>>> + /* Scratch line to use for LMT operation */
> >>>> + cvmmemctl.s.lmtline = 2;
> >>>
> >>> Out of curiosity, is there significance to the value 2 and associated
> >>> virtual address 0xffffffffffff8100, or is it pretty arbitrary?
> >>
> >> Yes, there is significance.
> >>
> >> CPU local memory starts at 0xffffffffffff8000, each line is 0x80 bytes.
> >> so the 2nd line starts at 0xffffffffffff8100
> >
> > What I mean is, why is 2 chosen instead of any other value?
>
> That is explained in the change log of patch 5/8:
>
>
> 1st 128-bytes: Use by IOBDMA
> 2nd 128-bytes: Reserved by kernel for scratch/TLS emulation.
> 3rd 128-bytes: OCTEON-III LMTLINE
Ah yes. Perhaps it deserves a brief comment in the code, or even an
enum.
Cheers
James
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
