On 29-11-17, 10:46, Rob Herring wrote: > On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 7:47 AM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > +- power-domain-opp: This contains phandle to one of the OPP nodes of the master > > + power domain. This specifies the minimum required OPP of the master domain for > > + the functioning of the device in this OPP (where this property is present). > > + This property can only be set for a device if the device node contains the > > + "power-domains" property. Also, either all or none of the OPP nodes in an OPP > > + table should have it set. > > This is a "this device requires OPP n" property. Couldn't we want this > for cases other than a powerdomain OPP? What if a device has > requirements 2 different OPPs? Hmm, I agree. We can/should make it more generic. > On the flipside, I don't think we want devices picking things like CPU > OPPs and putting policy here. But I'd rather things be extendable than > reviewing yet another OPP property next month. Sure, I would rename this property and make necessary changes to it. -- viresh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
