On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 04:55:39PM -0800, David Daney wrote:
> +static int bgx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct mac_platform_data platform_data;
> + const __be32 *reg;
> + u32 port;
> + u64 addr;
> + struct device_node *child;
> + struct platform_device *new_dev;
> + struct platform_device *pki_dev;
> + int numa_node, interface;
> + int i;
> + int r = 0;
> + char id[64];
> + u64 data;
> +
> + reg = of_get_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "reg", NULL);
> + addr = of_translate_address(pdev->dev.of_node, reg);
> + interface = (addr >> 24) & 0xf;
> + numa_node = (addr >> 36) & 0x7;
Hi David
You have these two a few times in the code. Maybe add a helper to do
it? The NUMA one i assume could go somewhere in the SoC code?
> +static int bgx_mix_init_from_fdt(void)
> +{
> + struct device_node *node;
> + struct device_node *parent = NULL;
> + int mix = 0;
> + /* Get the lmac index */
> + reg = of_get_property(lmac_fdt_node, "reg", NULL);
> + if (!reg)
> + goto err;
> +
> + mix_port_lmacs[mix].lmac = *reg;
I don't think of_get_property() deals with endianness. Is there any
danger of this driver being used on hardware with the other endianness
to what you have tested?
> +/**
> + * bgx_pki_init_from_param - Initialize the list of lmacs that connect to the
> + * pki from information in the "pki_port" parameter.
> + *
> + * The pki_port parameter format is as follows:
> + * pki_port=nbl
> + * where:
> + * n = node
> + * b = bgx
> + * l = lmac
> + *
> + * Commas must be used to separate multiple lmacs:
> + * pki_port=000,100,110
> + *
> + * Asterisks (*) specify all possible characters in
> + * the subset:
> + * pki_port=00* (all lmacs of node0 bgx0).
> + *
> + * Missing lmacs identifiers default to all
> + * possible characters in the subset:
> + * pki_port=00 (all lmacs on node0 bgx0)
> + *
> + * Brackets ('[' and ']') specify the valid
> + * characters in the subset:
> + * pki_port=00[01] (lmac0 and lmac1 of node0 bgx0).
> + *
> + * Returns 0 if successful.
> + * Returns <0 for error codes.
I've not used kerneldoc much, but i suspect this is wrongly formated:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.9/kernel-documentation.html#function-documentation
> +int bgx_port_ethtool_set_settings(struct net_device *netdev,
> + struct ethtool_cmd *cmd)
> +{
> + struct bgx_port_priv *p = bgx_port_netdev2priv(netdev);
> +
> + if (!capable(CAP_NET_ADMIN))
> + return -EPERM;
Not required. The enforces this. See dev_ethtool()
> +
> + if (p->phydev)
> + return phy_ethtool_sset(p->phydev, cmd);
> +
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(bgx_port_ethtool_set_settings);
> +
> +int bgx_port_ethtool_nway_reset(struct net_device *netdev)
> +{
> + struct bgx_port_priv *p = bgx_port_netdev2priv(netdev);
> +
> + if (!capable(CAP_NET_ADMIN))
> + return -EPERM;
Also not needed.
> +static void bgx_port_adjust_link(struct net_device *netdev)
> +{
> + struct bgx_port_priv *priv = bgx_port_netdev2priv(netdev);
> + bool link_changed = false;
> + unsigned int link;
> + unsigned int speed;
> + unsigned int duplex;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&priv->lock);
> +
> + if (!priv->phydev->link && priv->last_status.link)
> + link_changed = true;
> +
> + if (priv->phydev->link &&
> + (priv->last_status.link != priv->phydev->link ||
> + priv->last_status.duplex != priv->phydev->duplex ||
> + priv->last_status.speed != priv->phydev->speed))
> + link_changed = true;
> +
> + link = priv->phydev->link;
> + priv->last_status.link = priv->phydev->link;
> +
> + speed = priv->phydev->speed;
> + priv->last_status.speed = priv->phydev->speed;
> +
> + duplex = priv->phydev->duplex;
> + priv->last_status.duplex = priv->phydev->duplex;
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&priv->lock);
> +
> + if (link_changed) {
> + struct port_status status;
> +
> + phy_print_status(priv->phydev);
> +
> + status.link = link ? 1 : 0;
> + status.duplex = duplex;
> + status.speed = speed;
> + if (!link) {
> + netif_carrier_off(netdev);
> + /* Let TX drain. FIXME check that it is drained. */
> + mdelay(50);
> + }
> + priv->set_link(priv, status);
> + if (link)
> + netif_carrier_on(netdev);
The code should do netif_carrier_on/off for you. See phy_link_change()
> +static void bgx_port_check_state(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> + struct bgx_port_priv *priv;
> + struct port_status status;
> +
> + priv = container_of(work, struct bgx_port_priv, dwork.work);
> +
> + status = priv->get_link(priv);
> +
> + if (!status.link &&
> + priv->mode != PORT_MODE_SGMII && priv->mode != PORT_MODE_RGMII)
> + bgx_port_init_xaui_link(priv);
> +
> + if (priv->last_status.link != status.link) {
> + priv->last_status.link = status.link;
> + if (status.link)
> + netdev_info(priv->netdev, "Link is up - %d/%s\n",
> + status.speed,
> + status.duplex == DUPLEX_FULL ? "Full" : "Half");
You already have phy_print_status() in bgx_port_adjust_link(). Do you need this here?
> + else
> + netdev_info(priv->netdev, "Link is down\n");
> + }
> +
> + mutex_lock(&priv->lock);
> + if (priv->work_queued)
> + queue_delayed_work(check_state_wq, &priv->dwork, HZ);
> + mutex_unlock(&priv->lock);
> +}
> +
> +int bgx_port_enable(struct net_device *netdev)
> +{
> + } else {
> + priv->phydev = of_phy_connect(netdev, priv->phy_np,
> + bgx_port_adjust_link, 0, priv->phy_mode);
> + if (!priv->phydev)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + netif_carrier_off(netdev);
> +
> + if (priv->phydev)
You already checked this above.
> + phy_start_aneg(priv->phydev);
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(bgx_port_enable);
> +
> +int bgx_port_change_mtu(struct net_device *netdev, int new_mtu)
> +{
> + struct bgx_port_priv *priv = bgx_port_netdev2priv(netdev);
> + int max_frame;
> +
> + if (new_mtu < 60 || new_mtu > 65392) {
See dev_set_mtu(). If you have done your initialisation correctly, this
won't happen.
> +static int bgx_port_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + switch (priv->mode) {
> + case PORT_MODE_SGMII:
> + if (priv->phy_np &&
> + priv->phy_mode != PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_SGMII)
> + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "SGMII phy mode mismatch.\n");
> + goto set_link_functions;
> + case PORT_MODE_RGMII:
> + if (priv->phy_np &&
> + priv->phy_mode != PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII &&
> + priv->phy_mode != PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_ID &&
> + priv->phy_mode != PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_RXID &&
> + priv->phy_mode != PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_TXID)
phy_interface_mode_is_rgmii()
More later, maybe.
Andrew
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
