On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 7:10 PM, Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 11:41:22AM +0100, Ulrich Hecht wrote: >> Hi! >> >> Here's CAN and CAN FD support for the R-Car D3. This is a by-the-datasheet >> implementation, with the datasheet missing some bits, namely the pin map. >> I filled in the gaps with frog DNA^W^W^Wby deducing the information from >> pin numbers already in the PFC driver, so careful scrutiny is advised. >> >> CU >> Uli >> >> >> Ulrich Hecht (7): >> pinctrl: sh-pfc: r8a77995: Add CAN support >> pinctrl: sh-pfc: r8a77995: Add CAN FD support >> arm64: dts: r8a77995: Add CAN external clock support >> arm64: dts: r8a77995: Add CAN support >> arm64: dts: r8a77995: Add CAN FD support >> can: rcar_can: document r8a77995 (R-Car D3) compatibility strings >> can: rcar_canfd: document r8a77995 (R-Car D3) compatibility strings > > Hi Ulrich, > > is it safe, from a regression point of view, to apply the dts patches > to a tree that does not have the other patches present? I believe it is. CU Uli -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
