On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 09:37:02AM -0800, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: [...] > This isn't really a big deal to me, as I'm only interested in RISC-V > systems, but there's been some pushback on the concept of an SBI so it > seemed like a simple way to allow people to build non-SBI (and there for not > really RISC-V) systems. For those reading along: I suggested the /firmware/sbi node to Palmer, because I'm interested in such "not really RISC-V" systems, (because it makes the firmware's job easier to not implement the SBI — speaking with my coreboot hat, here.) > One option that wouldn't require a device tree node > would be to have Linux boot in machine mode [...] and then provide its > own SBI implementation. I think this can work. Thanks, Jonathan Neuschäfer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
