Re: [PATCH 2/3 RESEND] mfd: tc3589x: Reform device tree probing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> >> > Patch looks good to me. Is there any reason why we should rush this in
> >> > for v3.14, or is it okay to go to -next?
> >>
> >> No rush, but it's been on review like forever so unless there is
> >> some noise from the DT people at -rc1 I'd be very happy if you
> >> could apply patches 1 & 2 by then.
> >
> > I'm just waiting for their Ack. If I don't have it soon I'll review it
> > myself and any changes will have to come in via subsequent patch
> > submissions.
> >
> > I think it's sensible to head for v3.15 for this set.
> 
> So now that v3.14-rc1 is out can we queue this stuff?

Queued.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux