> Am 16.11.2017 um 13:32 schrieb Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxx>:
>
> On 16/11/17 10:50, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
>> The vendor name was "toppoly" but other panels and the vendor list
>> have defined it as "tpo". So let's fix it in driver and bindings.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>
>
>> -MODULE_ALIAS("spi:toppoly,td028ttec1");
>> +MODULE_ALIAS("spi:tpo,td028ttec1");
>
> Doesn't this mean that the module won't load if you have old bindings?
Hm.
Well, I think it can load but doesn't automatically from DT strings which might
be unexpected.
> Can't we have two module aliases?
I think we can. Just a random example:
https://elixir.free-electrons.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/w1/slaves/w1_therm.c#L754
So we should keep both.
Should I submit a new version?
BR,
Nikolaus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
