On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On 30/01/14 17:28, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> On Thursday 30 January 2014, Ian Campbell wrote: >>> mach-virt has existed for a while but it is not written down what it actually >>> consists of. Although it seems a bit unusual to document a binding for an >>> entire platform since mach-virt is entirely virtual it is helpful to have >>> something to refer to in the absence of a single concrete implementation. >>> >>> I've done my best to capture the requirements based on the git log and my >>> memory/understanding. >>> >>> While here remove the xenvm dts example, the Xen tools will now build a >>> suitable mach-virt compatible dts when launching the guest. >> >> It might be worth noting in the changeset comment that the 'compatible' >> string is actually no longer needed on newer kernels: All the members >> of the machine descriptor are now the defaults (we should remove the >> virt_init() function as well), and the fallback machine descriptor should >> work just fine if any other string gets passed. > > I will ack the patch that removes the mach-virt directory altogether! Did I never send that one out? I know I started something. Finding new employment has had me distracted... Rob -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
