Hi Nikolaus,
Thank you for the patch.
On Wednesday, 8 November 2017 23:09:29 EET H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
> The vendor name was "toppoly" but other panels and the vendor list
> have defined it as "tpo". So let's fix it in driver and bindings.
>
> Signed-off-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../display/panel/{toppoly,td028ttec1.txt => tpo,td028ttec1.txt} | 4 ++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/panel-tpo-td028ttec1.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/panel-tpo-td028ttec1.c | 4 ++--
> 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> rename
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/{toppoly,td028ttec1.txt =>
> tpo,td028ttec1.txt} (84%)
>
> diff --git
> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/toppoly,td028ttec1.txt
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/tpo,td028ttec1.txt
> similarity index 84%
> rename from
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/toppoly,td028ttec1.txt
> rename to
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/tpo,td028ttec1.txt index
> 7175dc3740ac..ed34253d9fb1 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/toppoly,td028ttec1.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/tpo,td028ttec1.txt @@
> -2,7 +2,7 @@ Toppoly TD028TTEC1 Panel
> ========================
>
> Required properties:
> -- compatible: "toppoly,td028ttec1"
> +- compatible: "tpo,td028ttec1"
>
> Optional properties:
> - label: a symbolic name for the panel
> @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ Example
> -------
>
> lcd-panel: td028ttec1@0 {
> - compatible = "toppoly,td028ttec1";
> + compatible = "tpo,td028ttec1";
> reg = <0>;
> spi-max-frequency = <100000>;
> spi-cpol;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/panel-tpo-td028ttec1.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/panel-tpo-td028ttec1.c index
> 0a38a0e8c925..2dab491478c2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/panel-tpo-td028ttec1.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/panel-tpo-td028ttec1.c
> @@ -452,7 +452,7 @@ static int td028ttec1_panel_remove(struct spi_device
> *spi) }
>
> static const struct of_device_id td028ttec1_of_match[] = {
> - { .compatible = "omapdss,toppoly,td028ttec1", },
> + { .compatible = "omapdss,tpo,td028ttec1", },
Doesn't this break backward compatibility with existing DT ?
> {},
> };
>
> @@ -471,7 +471,7 @@ static struct spi_driver td028ttec1_spi_driver = {
>
> module_spi_driver(td028ttec1_spi_driver);
>
> -MODULE_ALIAS("spi:toppoly,td028ttec1");
> +MODULE_ALIAS("spi:tpo,td028ttec1");
> MODULE_AUTHOR("H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>");
> MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Toppoly TD028TTEC1 panel driver");
> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> diff --git
> a/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/panel-tpo-td028ttec1.c
> b/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/panel-tpo-td028ttec1.c index
> 57e9e146ff74..39e1754746d2 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/panel-tpo-td028ttec1.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/panel-tpo-td028ttec1.c
> @@ -455,7 +455,7 @@ static int td028ttec1_panel_remove(struct spi_device
> *spi) }
>
> static const struct of_device_id td028ttec1_of_match[] = {
> - { .compatible = "omapdss,toppoly,td028ttec1", },
> + { .compatible = "omapdss,tpo,td028ttec1", },
> {},
> };
>
> @@ -474,7 +474,7 @@ static struct spi_driver td028ttec1_spi_driver = {
>
> module_spi_driver(td028ttec1_spi_driver);
>
> -MODULE_ALIAS("spi:toppoly,td028ttec1");
> +MODULE_ALIAS("spi:tpo,td028ttec1");
> MODULE_AUTHOR("H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>");
> MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Toppoly TD028TTEC1 panel driver");
> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
