On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 11:48 PM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 01-11-17, 16:14, Rob Herring wrote: >> On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 03:56:46PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: >> > Few routines don't have their dummy counterparts which results in build >> > failures where these routines are used without CONFIG_OF_ADDRESS >> > enabled. >> > >> > Fix those by defining the dummy versions. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> >> > --- >> > V2: >> > - Rebased again latest rc and resolved conflicts. >> > - No comments received on V1. >> >> What's your user? > > It was the previous version of boot constraint core, though I have > moved to another helper now. > > https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=150157976217258&w=2 > > Wouldn't it be better to define them anyway? No. As an example, ideally of_device_alloc would be an internal function. But we have one user in ibmebus. Rob -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
