On Wed, 18 Oct 2017 16:11:33 +1100 Stewart Smith <stewart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > I'd prefer they be documented in the kernel especially if they are > > used by the kernel. Of course, there's IBM bindings covered by various > > ?PAPR specs which wouldn't make sense to duplicate, but I'm guessing > > what's documented in skiboot are not covered by those specs. > > Correct. > > I don't have an objection to docs being in both places, as long as we > could keep both in sync. Would suitable comments in the RST doc files > pointing to the skiboot repo as the canonical copy work? Rob, any opinion on that? > > I'd like to be able to just diff a subtree of kernel and skiboot to see > if the docs have diverged. > > We may also need to think of a way to ensure that any of that moving > back/forth of edits is done in a way that makes licensing sense too > (skiboot is Apache 2.0) > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
