Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] staging: Introduce NVIDIA Tegra20 video decoder driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 4:26 PM, Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 18.10.2017 00:13, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Thierry Reding
>> <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 03:13:54PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/tegra/nvidia,tegra20-vde.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/tegra/nvidia,tegra20-vde.txt
>>> [...]
>>>>> +- resets : Must contain an entry for each entry in reset-names.
>>>>> +  See ../reset/reset.txt for details.
>>>>> +- reset-names : Must include the following entries:
>>>>> +  - vde
>>>>
>>>> -names is pointless when there is only one.
>>>
>>> I'd prefer to keep it. In the past we occasionally had to add clocks or
>>> resets to a device tree node where only one had been present (and hence
>>> no -names property) and that caused some awkwardness because verbiage
>>> had to be added to the bindings that clarified that one particular entry
>>> (the original one) always had to come first.
>>
>> The order should be specified regardless of -names and the original
>> one has to come first if you add any. That's not awkwardness, but how
>> bindings work.
>
> Probably it would be okay to remove '-names' from the binding doc, but keep them
> in the actual DT, wouldn't it?

No. Then where are the names documented?

Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux