On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 06:35:24PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > I'd like to add something on the topic of non-Linux projects. In this > case it's diverging DT bindings from U-boot: > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/823158/ > U-boot already has a set of devicetree binding additions: > https://github.com/u-boot/u-boot/tree/master/doc/device-tree-bindings > The patch in question wants to ab(use) the regulator-name property for > driver instance binding. In my opinion this is not going to fly, as > boards are free to define the names. This either sees no use other than > as a dirty workaround for dts files that aren't following the PMIC > regulator bindings (regulator node names should follow well defined, > identifying names), or results in divergence of the DT files. One meta issue I'm seeing here is that the u-boot people appear to have their own divergent copy of some of the binding documents.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
