Re: [Ksummit-discuss] Devicetree Workshop at Kernel Summit Prague (26 Oct 2017)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 11:48:23AM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> Hello Grant,
> 
> On Mon, 9 Oct 2017 21:39:51 +0100
> Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Kernel Summit is now just over 2 weeks away and it is time to pull
> > together the schedule for the Devicetree workshop. Originally I
> > planned on just an afternoon, but I've got the room for the whole day,
> > so I've got a lot of flexibility on the schedule. Unscheduled time can
> > be used for hacking.
> > 
> > Date: 26 Oct 2017
> > Time: 9:00am-5:30pm (Lunch from 12:30-2:30)
> > Location: Athens room - Hilton Prague
> > 
> > If you plan to attend, make sure you update your OSSunmitE/ELCE
> > registration to include the DT Workshop (log in to access and modify
> > your registration):
> > 
> > https://www.regonline.com/register/login.aspx?eventID=1883377&MethodId=0&EventsessionId=&Email_Address=&membershipID=
> > 
> > Here is my current list of topics in no particular order, including
> > the topic moderator:
> > 
> > Runtime memory consumption (Rob Herring)
> > Overlay maintenance plan (TBC)
> > Stable ABI for devicetree (TBC)
> > DT YAML encoding (Pantelis Antoniou)
> > DT Schema format - option 1 (Pantelis Antoniou)
> > DT Schema format - option 2 (Grant Likely)
> > Sharing Generic bindings (TBC)
> > devicetree.org update (Grant)
> > 
> > Reply to this email if you want to propose another topic.
> 
> Not sure yet if I'll attend the DT workshop or not, but I thought I
> could ask my question here because it might be of interest to someone
> else who is attending.
> 
> What happens when the DT bindings is not documented in Linux but in an
> another project because this project was the first to use it.
> 
> I had the case here http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/810275/, and I'm
> not sure what's the policy when this happens. Should we add a file
> under Documentation/devicetree/bindings/... that points to the external
> doc file, should we duplicate the DT bindings doc in Linux, or should
> we just leave the bindings undocumented in the kernel tree?

I really hope (and have tried pushing via some other channels) that
given Android's embrace of devicetree for Android 8 they will have
people present as there's going to be issues like the above cropping up
now.

-- 
Tom
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux