Hello. On 01/28/2014 02:49 AM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
The "ti,davinci-no-bd-ram" property for the DaVinci EMAC binding simply can't be required one, as it's boolean (which means it's absent if false).
While at it, document the property better...
Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/davinci_emac.txt | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: net/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/davinci_emac.txt =================================================================== --- net.orig/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/davinci_emac.txt +++ net/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/davinci_emac.txt @@ -10,7 +10,6 @@ Required properties: - ti,davinci-ctrl-mod-reg-offset: offset to control module register - ti,davinci-ctrl-ram-offset: offset to control module ram - ti,davinci-ctrl-ram-size: size of control module ram -- ti,davinci-no-bd-ram: has the emac controller BD RAM - interrupts: interrupt mapping for the davinci emac interrupts sources: 4 sources: <Receive Threshold Interrupt Receive Interrupt @@ -22,6 +21,7 @@ Optional properties: If absent, davinci_emac driver defaults to 100/FULL. - local-mac-address : 6 bytes, mac address - ti,davinci-rmii-en: 1 byte, 1 means use RMII +- ti,davinci-no-bd-ram: boolean, does EMAC has BD RAM?
Too hasty, s/has/have/. Do I need to resend or this could be fixed when applying?
WBR, Sergei -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html