Hi, Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@xxxxxx> writes: > Hi > > On 10/11/2017 01:50 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@xxxxxx> writes: >>> Hi Felip >>> >>> On 10/11/2017 12:04 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@xxxxxx> writes: >>>>> The STM32F7 MCU family embeds two DWC2 USB OTG cores. One core is USB >>>>> OTG FS and the other is USB OTG HS. The USB FS core only works with its >>>>> internal phy whilst the USB HS core can work in HS with external ULPI phy >>>>> or in FS/LS with the on-chip FS phy. >>>>> >>>>> Amelie Delaunay (7): >>>>> dt-bindings: usb: Document the STM32F7 DWC2 USB OTG HS core binding >>>>> usb: dwc2: add support for STM32F7 USB OTG HS >>>>> ARM: dts: stm32: Add USB HS support for STM32F746 MCU >>>> >>>> I have applied these three patches. Should I take the rest? They seems >>>> like they could go upstream through the ARM maintainers. >>>> >>> >>> I will take other DT patches in my PR. >>> >>> Concerning "ARM: dts: stm32: Add USB HS support for STM32F746 MCU" patch >>> I prefer also to take it. This patch adds some pinctrl groups but stm32 >>> pinctrl bindings will change in my next PR (we will use a macro to >>> define pins instead of using defined values). So if you push the DT >>> patch through your pull request there will be a merge issue. >>> It is possible that I take also this one ? >> >> In that case, it's best if you take them all :-) Here's my Ack: >> >> Acked-by: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> I'll drop them from my tree now > > Ok perfect, I will take DT patches (3 to 7) and I let you take patch 1&2 > in your tree. Well, I have dropped them from my tree. Please two 1-7 through yours. -- balbi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
