Hello Geert,
thank you for your feedback!
>
> Hi Fabrizio, Chris,
>
> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Fabrizio Castro
> <fabrizio.castro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Paterson <chris.paterson2@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks for your patch!
>
> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/iwg20d-q7-common.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/iwg20d-q7-common.dtsi
> > @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> > / {
> > aliases {
> > serial0 = &scif0;
> > + serial3 = &scifb1;
>
> Given this port is not labeled "serial3", but called "data uart", you may want
> to add a comment to avoid confusion:
It's a little bit confusing, isn't it? The lines related to such interface are named as UART0_x on the carrier board schematic, the section of the schematic that contains the header is named "data uart header", and the board documentation names it explicitly as "UART 3 - /dev/ttySC3 (SCIFB1)".
I don't think there is anything we can do to make this easier for the user really, is there? :D
If we decide to add a comment to serial 3, I guess we need to be consistent and add comments for the other serial interfaces too.
If you still prefer having a comment there I'll send a v2 and patch(es) for adding comments to the other interfaces, just let me know.
Thanks,
Fab
>
> serial3 = &scifb1; /* data uart */
>
> > ethernet0 = &avb;
> > };
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
>
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
> -- Linus Torvalds
Renesas Electronics Europe Ltd, Dukes Meadow, Millboard Road, Bourne End, Buckinghamshire, SL8 5FH, UK. Registered in England & Wales under Registered No. 04586709.
��.n��������+%������w��{.n����z�{��ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
