On 01/24/2014 07:35 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
So far so good. Now, what about this external oscillator which has its
own separate power control. My immediate thought is that this can be
specified via card_ext_clock - I would simply need to declare a fixed-rate
clock with either a regulator (power switch) controlled via a gpio (which
would probably be closer to the hardware) or a gpio as an enable... ah,
that requires me to write a common clock driver for that bit since this
is currently not modelled by CCF...
Jiry Sarha posted a gpio controlled clock proposal:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg16651.html
I have not received too much feedback to my patch yet. CCF is a bit new
territory to me, but I think having a separate stackable clk-gpio would
be more flexible than having the gpio property implemented in
clk-fixed-rate.
Anyway, I am happy do it either way as long as I can get a gpio
-controlled clock implementation into the main line.
Cheers,
Jyri
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
