On Tue, 3 Oct 2017, Frank Rowand wrote: > On 10/03/17 11:46, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > On Tue, 3 Oct 2017, Rob Herring wrote: > > > >> For static DT usecases, we don't need the disabled nodes and can skip > >> unflattening. This saves a significant amount of RAM in memory constrained > >> cases. In one example on STM32F469, the RAM usage goes from 118K to 26K. > >> > >> There are a few cases in the kernel that modify the status property > >> dynamically. These all are changes from enabled to disabled, depend on > >> OF_DYNAMIC or are not FDT based (PDT based). > >> > >> Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> Cc: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@xxxxxxxxx> > >> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Tested-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > >> --- > >> For more background, see this presentation from Nico: > >> > >> https://connect.linaro.org/resource/sfo17/sfo17-100/ > > > > Oh my ... this is horrible ... > > I found the presentation to be quite good and useful. Thanks. I think the content is good. I'm just a terrible speaker. > The Linaro site does not have the slides, could you please send > me a copy? I've asked for the slides to be uploaded to the site. I've sent you a copy privately in the mean time. Nicolas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
