Re: [PATCH 01/10] dt-bindings: bus: Minimal TI sysc interconnect target module binding

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




* Matthijs van Duin <matthijsvanduin@xxxxxxxxx> [170927 02:57]:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 10:44:14AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Matthijs van Duin <matthijsvanduin@xxxxxxxxx> [170925 10:22]:
> > > Ah... three "foreign" modules with an idlemode carelessly thrown into a
> > > register without care for existing layouts.  I think these are more just
> > > exceptional cases which happen to agree by coincidence since they all
> > > just added idlemode in the simplest way possible, but I can understand
> > > how it came to be viewed as a standard type.
> > 
> > So we shall then name this fine centauroid sysc ti,81xx-sysc?
> 
> There's nothing centauroid specific about this, mcasp on omap4 has it too.

OK and for that we have ti,sysc-mcasp. We can call the generic one
ti,sysc-omap4-simple.

Regards,

Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux