Hello, On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 11:13:00 +0200, Gregory CLEMENT wrote: > >> - clock-names: > >> Array of names corresponding to clocks property. > >> The input clock for Xenon IP core should be named as "core". > >> + The input clock for the AXI bus must be named as "axi". > > > > Is "bus" more suitable? > > I find bus too vague. Actually no, I believe "bus" is more common. Indeed, you could have the same IP, attached to a different interconnect I guess. > >> /* > >> * Link Xenon specific mmc_host_ops function, > >> @@ -491,9 +493,20 @@ static int xenon_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > >> if (err) > >> goto free_pltfm; > >> > >> + priv->axi_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "axi"); > >> + if (IS_ERR(priv->axi_clk)) { -EPROBE_DEFER handling ? > >> + err = PTR_ERR(priv->axi_clk); > >> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to setup axi clk: %d\n", err); > > > > Since the bus clock is optional, can we remove this err msg? > > I will change it in dev_info. This clock is optional (in order to keep DT backward compatibility), so there shouldn't be any error message, be it dev_err() or dev_info(). Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html