On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> +- interrupts : 1 interrupt for RSPI cores using a single multiplexed
>> + interrupt,
>> + 3 interrupts (SPEI, SPRI, SPTI) for RSPI cores using
>> + separate interrupts.
>> +- interrupt-names : Array of strings associated with the interrupt numbers:
>> + "error" for SPEI, "rx" for SPRI, and "tx" for SPTI.
>> + For RSPI cores using a single multiplexed interrupt, the
>> + name "mux" is optional.
>
> Rather than defining the set of interrupts twice, it would be nice to
> have interrupts defined in terms of interrupt-names:
>
> - interrupts: a list of interrupt-specifiers, one for each entry in
> interrupt-names. If interrupt-names is not present, an interrupt
> specifier for a single muxed interrupt.
>
> - interrupt-names: A list of interrupt names. Should contain (if
> present):
> * "error" for SPEI
> * "rx" for SPRI
> * "tx" to SPTI
> * "mux" for a single muxed interrupt
Yes, that sounds much better, thank you.
Will update.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
