Hi Laurent,
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 02:53:16PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Sakari,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Friday, 15 September 2017 17:17:06 EEST Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > Instead of using driver implementation, use
>
> Same comment as for patch 06/25.
Will fix.
>
> > v4l2_async_notifier_parse_fwnode_endpoints() to parse the fwnode endpoints
> > of the device.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Acked-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-core.c | 112 ++++++++-----------------
> > drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-dma.c | 10 +--
> > drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-v4l2.c | 14 ++--
> > drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-vin.h | 4 +-
> > 4 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 92 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-core.c
> > b/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-core.c index
> > 142de447aaaa..62b4a94f9a39 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-core.c
>
> [snip]
>
> > @@ -120,117 +121,70 @@ static int rvin_digital_notify_bound(struct
>
> [snip]
>
> > -static int rvin_digitial_parse_v4l2(struct rvin_dev *vin,
> > - struct device_node *ep,
> > - struct v4l2_mbus_config *mbus_cfg)
> > +static int rvin_digital_parse_v4l2(struct device *dev,
> > + struct v4l2_fwnode_endpoint *vep,
> > + struct v4l2_async_subdev *asd)
> > {
> > - struct v4l2_fwnode_endpoint v4l2_ep;
> > - int ret;
> > + struct rvin_dev *vin = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>
> Doesn't this show that we miss a context argument to the callback function ?
> Storing the context in device driver data is probably OK if the driver parsing
> the endpoints controls the struct device, but is that always the case ?
How does a driver know the hardware other than, uh, the device?
I guess we could add a private pointer when the async notifier is
registered if there's a real need for it. The notifier could be an
alternative but it wouldn't be applicable to sub-devices.
>
> > + struct rvin_graph_entity *rvge =
> > + container_of(asd, struct rvin_graph_entity, asd);
> >
> > - ret = v4l2_fwnode_endpoint_parse(of_fwnode_handle(ep), &v4l2_ep);
> > - if (ret) {
> > - vin_err(vin, "Could not parse v4l2 endpoint\n");
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > - }
> > + if (vep->base.port || vep->base.id)
> > + return -ENOTCONN;
> >
> > - mbus_cfg->type = v4l2_ep.bus_type;
> > + rvge->mbus_cfg.type = vep->bus_type;
> >
> > - switch (mbus_cfg->type) {
> > + switch (rvge->mbus_cfg.type) {
> > case V4L2_MBUS_PARALLEL:
> > vin_dbg(vin, "Found PARALLEL media bus\n");
> > - mbus_cfg->flags = v4l2_ep.bus.parallel.flags;
> > + rvge->mbus_cfg.flags = vep->bus.parallel.flags;
> > break;
> > case V4L2_MBUS_BT656:
> > vin_dbg(vin, "Found BT656 media bus\n");
> > - mbus_cfg->flags = 0;
> > + rvge->mbus_cfg.flags = 0;
> > break;
> > default:
> > vin_err(vin, "Unknown media bus type\n");
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> >
> > - return 0;
> > -}
> > -
> > -static int rvin_digital_graph_parse(struct rvin_dev *vin)
> > -{
> > - struct device_node *ep, *np;
> > - int ret;
> > -
> > - vin->digital.asd.match.fwnode.fwnode = NULL;
> > - vin->digital.subdev = NULL;
> > -
> > - /*
> > - * Port 0 id 0 is local digital input, try to get it.
> > - * Not all instances can or will have this, that is OK
> > - */
> > - ep = of_graph_get_endpoint_by_regs(vin->dev->of_node, 0, 0);
> > - if (!ep)
> > - return 0;
> > -
> > - np = of_graph_get_remote_port_parent(ep);
> > - if (!np) {
> > - vin_err(vin, "No remote parent for digital input\n");
> > - of_node_put(ep);
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > - }
> > - of_node_put(np);
> > -
> > - ret = rvin_digitial_parse_v4l2(vin, ep, &vin->digital.mbus_cfg);
> > - of_node_put(ep);
> > - if (ret)
> > - return ret;
> > -
> > - vin->digital.asd.match.fwnode.fwnode = of_fwnode_handle(np);
> > - vin->digital.asd.match_type = V4L2_ASYNC_MATCH_FWNODE;
> > + vin->digital = rvge;
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > static int rvin_digital_graph_init(struct rvin_dev *vin)
> > {
> > - struct v4l2_async_subdev **subdevs = NULL;
> > int ret;
> >
> > - ret = rvin_digital_graph_parse(vin);
> > + ret = v4l2_async_notifier_parse_fwnode_endpoints(
> > + vin->dev, &vin->notifier,
> > + sizeof(struct rvin_graph_entity), rvin_digital_parse_v4l2);
> > if (ret)
> > return ret;
> >
> > - if (!vin->digital.asd.match.fwnode.fwnode) {
> > - vin_dbg(vin, "No digital subdevice found\n");
> > - return -ENODEV;
> > - }
> > -
> > - /* Register the subdevices notifier. */
> > - subdevs = devm_kzalloc(vin->dev, sizeof(*subdevs), GFP_KERNEL);
> > - if (subdevs == NULL)
> > - return -ENOMEM;
> > -
> > - subdevs[0] = &vin->digital.asd;
> > -
> > - vin_dbg(vin, "Found digital subdevice %pOF\n",
> > - to_of_node(subdevs[0]->match.fwnode.fwnode));
> > + if (vin->digital)
> > + vin_dbg(vin, "Found digital subdevice %pOF\n",
> > + to_of_node(
> > + vin->digital->asd.match.fwnode.fwnode));
>
> Isn't this is a change in behaviour ? The driver currently returns -ENODEV
> when no digital subdev is found.
Seems so, I'll address that in v14.
>
> > - vin->notifier.num_subdevs = 1;
> > - vin->notifier.subdevs = subdevs;
> > vin->notifier.bound = rvin_digital_notify_bound;
> > vin->notifier.unbind = rvin_digital_notify_unbind;
> > vin->notifier.complete = rvin_digital_notify_complete;
> > -
> > ret = v4l2_async_notifier_register(&vin->v4l2_dev, &vin->notifier);
> > if (ret < 0) {
> > vin_err(vin, "Notifier registration failed\n");
>
--
Regards,
Sakari Ailus
sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
