Hi, On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 3:50 AM, Xue Liu <liuxuenetmail@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hello Pan, > > From my point of view, it is not a good idea to write sx127x driver > for IEEE 802154. Because LoRa is not compatible with IEEE 802.15.4 in > PHY and MAC layer. > This isn't true. The security layer is exactly the same and copied from IEEE 802.15.4. The rest of the mac layer is pretty simple. Simpler than IEEE 802.15.4... for now. > I think it is better to make individual Phy and MAC layers for LoRa in > Linux kernel, where a sx127x driver will make sense. What about to introduce a new interface type? Then you can do a complete different parsing on this interface type and share the code what you need from 802.15.4 - Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
