Hi,
On 01/22/2014 09:52 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 01/22/2014 09:34 PM, Jonas Gorski wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 22 Jan 2014 20:28:26 +0100
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
On 01/21/2014 08:39 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
2014/1/21 Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>:
This uses the already documented devicetree booleans for this.
(I would greatly appreciate if you could CC people who gave you
feedback on this before)
Will do.
A more informative commit message would be welcome, along with a
reference to which Device Tree binding documentation you are referring
to.
I've added a reference to the bindings doc in the commit msg for my next version.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/usb/host/Kconfig | 3 +++
drivers/usb/host/ehci-platform.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/Kconfig b/drivers/usb/host/Kconfig
index 237d7b1..4af41f3 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/Kconfig
@@ -256,6 +256,9 @@ config USB_EHCI_ATH79
config USB_EHCI_HCD_PLATFORM
tristate "Generic EHCI driver for a platform device"
depends on !PPC_OF
+ # Support BE on architectures which have readl_be
+ select USB_EHCI_BIG_ENDIAN_DESC if (AVR32 || MIPS || MICROBLAZE || SPARC || PPC32 || PPC64)
+ select USB_EHCI_BIG_ENDIAN_MMIO if (AVR32 || MIPS || MICROBLAZE || SPARC || PPC32 || PPC64)
I do not think this is that simple nor correct for at least Microblaze
and MIPS since they can run in either BE or LE mode, and those
specific platforms should already do the proper select at the
board/SoC level. This *might* be correct for SPARC, PPC32 and PPC64,
although I believe some specific PPC64 boards can run in little-endian
mode like the P-series, SPARC might too.
It seems to me that you should not touch this and keep the existing
selects in place, if it turns out that the selects are missing the
error messages you added below are catching those misuses.
As discussed with Alan, I will drop these lines from my next version.
default n
---help---
Adds an EHCI host driver for a generic platform device, which
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-platform.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-platform.c
index d8aebc0..5888abb 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-platform.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-platform.c
@@ -55,8 +55,10 @@ static int ehci_platform_reset(struct usb_hcd *hcd)
hcd->has_tt = pdata->has_tt;
ehci->has_synopsys_hc_bug = pdata->has_synopsys_hc_bug;
- ehci->big_endian_desc = pdata->big_endian_desc;
- ehci->big_endian_mmio = pdata->big_endian_mmio;
+ if (pdata->big_endian_desc)
+ ehci->big_endian_desc = 1;
+ if (pdata->big_endian_mmio)
+ ehci->big_endian_mmio = 1;
if (pdata->pre_setup) {
retval = pdata->pre_setup(hcd);
@@ -142,6 +144,7 @@ static int ehci_platform_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
struct resource *res_mem;
struct usb_ehci_pdata *pdata = dev_get_platdata(&dev->dev);
struct ehci_platform_priv *priv;
+ struct ehci_hcd *ehci;
int err, irq, clk = 0;
if (usb_disabled())
@@ -177,8 +180,34 @@ static int ehci_platform_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
platform_set_drvdata(dev, hcd);
dev->dev.platform_data = pdata;
priv = hcd_to_ehci_priv(hcd);
+ ehci = hcd_to_ehci(hcd);
if (pdata == &ehci_platform_defaults && dev->dev.of_node) {
+ if (of_property_read_bool(dev->dev.of_node, "big-endian-regs"))
+ ehci->big_endian_mmio = 1;
+
+ if (of_property_read_bool(dev->dev.of_node, "big-endian-desc"))
+ ehci->big_endian_desc = 1;
+
+ if (of_property_read_bool(dev->dev.of_node, "big-endian"))
+ ehci->big_endian_mmio = ehci->big_endian_desc = 1;
Ok, so I am confused now, should you update
pdata->ehci_big_endian_{desc,mmio} here or is it valid to directly
modify ehci->big_endian_{desc,mmio}, is not there any risk to undo
what is done in ehci_platform_reset(), or is ehci_platform_reset()
only called for non-DT cases?
Both the pdata checks in ehci_platform_reset() and the dt checks here only
ever set these flags, neither code path clears them. And in the dt case pdata
will be NULL and vice versa.
If it's safe to set ehci->big_endian_{desc,mmio} from the _probe()
routine, then maybe the pdata sets in _reset() should be moved into here
instead of adding extra cludges/checks into _reset().
That seems like an entire separate patch / improvement on top of adding support
for big-endian controllers to the dt code.
If people won't to improve on thus further and / or clean things up further I'm
sure the usb-subsys maintainers would welcome patches.
s/won't to improve on thus/want to improve this/
<snip more suggestions best done in a separate patch written by someone else>
Regards,
Hans
Regards,
Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
