2017-09-07 21:04 GMT+09:00 Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>:
> On 07/09/17 12:41, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>> Commit 6a6544e520ab ("genirq/irqdomain: Remove auto-recursive hierarchy
>> support") not only deleted IRQ_DOMAIN_FLAG_AUTO_RECURSIVE, but also
>> moved IRQ_DOMAIN_NAME_ALLOCATED up.
>>
>> Get it back to the original position to sort the enum by the bit shift.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes in v4:
>> - Newly added
>>
>>
>> include/linux/irqdomain.h | 6 +++---
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/irqdomain.h b/include/linux/irqdomain.h
>> index 81e4889..31be32d 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/irqdomain.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/irqdomain.h
>> @@ -180,9 +180,6 @@ enum {
>> /* Irq domain is hierarchical */
>> IRQ_DOMAIN_FLAG_HIERARCHY = (1 << 0),
>>
>> - /* Irq domain name was allocated in __irq_domain_add() */
>> - IRQ_DOMAIN_NAME_ALLOCATED = (1 << 6),
>> -
>> /* Irq domain is an IPI domain with virq per cpu */
>> IRQ_DOMAIN_FLAG_IPI_PER_CPU = (1 << 2),
>>
>> @@ -195,6 +192,9 @@ enum {
>> /* Irq domain implements MSI remapping */
>> IRQ_DOMAIN_FLAG_MSI_REMAP = (1 << 5),
>>
>> + /* Irq domain name was allocated in __irq_domain_add() */
>> + IRQ_DOMAIN_NAME_ALLOCATED = (1 << 6),
>> +
>
> The right fix would be to leave it where it is, but to actually fix the
> shift, which is what I should have done the first place.
You are definitely right.
At first, I missed the fact that (1 << 6) was already used,
then I assigned the same value to my new flag.
So, I tried to fix the list before adding my new one.
Without 5/6, I do not have a good reason to
push this cosmetic patch only.
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
