On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 11:06 PM, David Gibson <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 12:28:19PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 11:30:04AM +1000, David Gibson wrote: >> > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 05:20:09PM +0100, Russell King wrote: >> > > dtc uses an incorrect format specifier for printing a uint64_t value. >> > > uint64_t may be either 'unsigned long' or 'unsigned long long' depending >> > > on the host architecture. >> > > >> > > Fix this by using %llx and casting to unsigned long long, which ensures >> > > that we always have a wide enough variable to print 64 bits of hex. >> > > >> > > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/checks.o >> > > scripts/dtc/checks.c: In function 'check_simple_bus_reg': >> > > scripts/dtc/checks.c:876:2: warning: format '%zx' expects argument of type 'size_t', but argument 4 has type 'uint64_t' [-Wformat=] >> > > snprintf(unit_addr, sizeof(unit_addr), "%zx", reg); >> > > ^ >> > > scripts/dtc/checks.c:876:2: warning: format '%zx' expects argument of type 'size_t', but argument 4 has type 'uint64_t' [-Wformat=] >> > > >> > > Fixes: 828d4cdd012c ("dtc: check.c fix compile error") >> > > Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > >> > This (embarrassing) error is already fixed in upstream dtc. >> >> It remains unfixed in 4.13-rc4. How do we get this fixed in the >> kernel's dtc? From what I can see, sending a patch to fix stuff >> doesn't work. Sorry, didn't see this until Andrew M picked it up. > Um.. I don't know. I haven't been the person doing updates of the > kernel dtc to match upstream dtc for ages. The flow is submit a patch to upstream dtc on devicetree-compiler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and then bug me to cherry-pick or sync dtc. I will cherry-pick the upstream version. Rob -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html