On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 10:38:36PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote: > On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 08:50:25PM +0200, Corentin Labbe wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 01:05:21AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 8:21 PM, Corentin Labbe > > > <clabbe.montjoie@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > In case of a MDIO switch, the registered MDIO node should be > > > > the parent of the PHY. Otherwise of_phy_connect will fail. > > Hi Corentin > > Sorry, I missed this patch series. Looking at patchwork... That's my fault, I forgot to set you in recipient like in last send. > > Can you represent the MDIO mux using > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/mdio-mux-mmioreg.txt > > It would be better if you could reuse existing infrastructure than > invent something new. > I think we cannot use mdio-mux-mmioreg since the register for doing the switch is in middle of the "System Control" and shared with other functions. This is why we use a sycon/regmap for selecting the MDIO. Regards -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
