On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 03:39:34PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > > Just think about that how do you code your driver for SPI NOR _without_ this > > framework: > > do your driver need to call the m25p80.c? if you do call the m25p80.c, you > > actually write your so-called "two drivers" :) > > I'm still not convinced here, sorry! > Let me explain more with example, Just take your (q)spi controller as an example > B_FSL1 designed with - serial flash > B_FSL2 designed with - touch screen > > With this design If we follow current we just need one controller > driver (drivers/spi/spi-fsl.c) > to serve touch screen and serial flash from upper layers. > > MTD core Input core > ------------- ------------------------------- > m25p80.c spi touchscreen driver (drivers/input/touchscreen) > ---------------------------------------------------- > SPI core > ---------------------------------------------------- > controller driver (drivers/spi/spi-fsl.) > ---------------------------------------------------- > > But with your new SPI-NOR > > MTD core > ------------ > SPI-NOR Input core > ----------- ------------------ > fsl-quadspi.c spi touchscreen driver (drivers/input/touchscreen) > ---------------- ------------------------------ > SPI Core > ----------------------------- > controller driver (drivers/spi/spi-fsl.c) > ----------------------------------------- > There is no relationship with the fsl-quadspi.c. It should be like this: MTD core ------------ SPI-NOR framework Input core ----------- ------------------ m25p80.c spi touchscreen driver (drivers/input/touchscreen) ---------------- ------------------------------ SPI Core SPI Core ----------------------- ----------------------------- drivers/spi/spi-fsl.c controller driver (drivers/spi/spi-fsl.c) -------------------------- ----------------------------------------- > Here see we have two separate drivers for the same controller as it offers two > functionalities. and also it never talk to Linux SPI subsystem which is not a > good for me as intern hw is SPI-based it must talk to subsystem to make use of > Linux SPI API's. > > And also you mentioned SPI-NOR controller is not a SPI controller what does that > means because it's a NOR flash which is of SPI protocol based. The SPI controller (or spi bus controller) only handles the _byte_ streams; while the spi-nor controller, such as fsl-quadspi.c, can has to __known__ the exact SPI NOR command to find the proper LUT. Please read the thread i ever posted in the previous email. > > I understand that your framework doing good things in matured manner, but > seems like it's confuse to me to follow common standards - Just my > opinion, may be I'm incorrect. > > One more thing question - I have 1-wire spi controller which I was > used for flash in > one board and keyboard in another board, so if I follow your framework > I need to write > a driver in drivers/mtd/spi-nor/foo-spi.c and one more in > drivers/spi/spi-foo.c - correct? Please read the device tree node of your controller, find the code like ................................................... flash: m25p80@0 { #address-cells = <1>; #size-cells = <1>; compatible = "st,m25p32"; spi-max-frequency = <20000000>; reg = <0>; }; ................................................... if you call the m25p80, you do not need to change anything. thanks Huang Shijie -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html