On Friday 17 January 2014, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rfkill/rfkill-gpio.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rfkill/rfkill-gpio.txt > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..8a07ea4 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rfkill/rfkill-gpio.txt > @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@ > +GPIO controlled RFKILL devices > + > +Required properties: > +- compatible : Must be "rfkill-gpio". > +- rfkill-name : Name of RFKILL device > +- rfkill-type : Type of RFKILL device: 1 for WiFi, 2 for BlueTooth > +- NAME_shutdown-gpios : GPIO phandle to shutdown control > + (phandle must be the second) > +- NAME_reset-gpios : GPIO phandle to reset control > + > +NAME must match the rfkill-name property. NAME_shutdown-gpios or > +NAME_reset-gpios, or both, must be defined. > + I don't understand this part. Why do you include the name in the gpios property, rather than just hardcoding the property strings to "shutdown-gpios" and "reset-gpios"? The description of hte "rfkill-name" property seems to suggest that you can only have one logical RFKILL device per device node, so he names would not be ambiguous. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
