On 07/21/2017 11:54 AM, Vinod Koul wrote: > On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 09:30:00AM +0000, Pierre Yves MORDRET wrote: >>>> +static enum dma_slave_buswidth stm32_mdma_get_max_width(u32 buf_len, u32 tlen) >>>> +{ >>>> + enum dma_slave_buswidth max_width = DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_8_BYTES; >>>> + >>>> + while (((buf_len % max_width) || (tlen < max_width)) && >>>> + (max_width > DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_1_BYTE)) >>>> + max_width = max_width >> 1; >>> >>> ok, this is a bit hard to read... >> >> This code snippet has already been reworked and optimized. Would you mind to >> provide me a example with your expectation ? Thanks > > Code is optimized yes, but readable no > > I would like readability to be improved upon... > gotcha >> >>> >>>> +static int stm32_mdma_set_xfer_param(struct stm32_mdma_chan *chan, >>>> + enum dma_transfer_direction direction, >>>> + u32 *mdma_ccr, u32 *mdma_ctcr, >>>> + u32 *mdma_ctbr, u32 buf_len) >>>> +{ >>>> + struct stm32_mdma_device *dmadev = stm32_mdma_get_dev(chan); >>>> + struct stm32_mdma_chan_config *chan_config = &chan->chan_config; >>>> + enum dma_slave_buswidth src_addr_width, dst_addr_width; >>>> + phys_addr_t src_addr, dst_addr; >>>> + int src_bus_width, dst_bus_width; >>>> + u32 src_maxburst, dst_maxburst, src_best_burst, dst_best_burst; >>>> + u32 ccr, ctcr, ctbr, tlen; >>>> + >>>> + src_addr_width = chan->dma_config.src_addr_width; >>>> + dst_addr_width = chan->dma_config.dst_addr_width; >>>> + src_maxburst = chan->dma_config.src_maxburst; >>>> + dst_maxburst = chan->dma_config.dst_maxburst; >>>> + src_addr = chan->dma_config.src_addr; >>>> + dst_addr = chan->dma_config.dst_addr; >>> >>> this doesn't seem right to me, only the periphral address would come from >>> slave_config, the memory address is passed as an arg to transfer.. >>> >>> ... >>> >> >> Correct. But these locals are managed in the case statement below. if direction >> is Mem2Dev only dst_addr(Peripheral) is considered. In the other way around with >> Dev2Mem direction only src_addr(Peripheral) is considered. >> However to disambiguate I can move src_addr & dst_addr affectation in the >> corresponding case statement if you'd like. > > But below you are over writing both, so in effect this is wasted cycles.. > anyway latter one is more clear, so lets remove from here. > Sorry I don't follow ... or miss something For instance if direction is Mem2Dev ..._xfer_param is going to configure Destination Bus width and Addr given by slave_config. ..._setup_xfer in its turn will configure source given as parameter. Don't the see the over-writing >> >>>> +static int stm32_mdma_setup_xfer(struct stm32_mdma_chan *chan, >>>> + struct stm32_mdma_desc *desc, >>>> + struct scatterlist *sgl, u32 sg_len, >>>> + enum dma_transfer_direction direction) >>>> +{ >>>> + struct stm32_mdma_device *dmadev = stm32_mdma_get_dev(chan); >>>> + struct dma_slave_config *dma_config = &chan->dma_config; >>>> + struct scatterlist *sg; >>>> + dma_addr_t src_addr, dst_addr; >>>> + u32 ccr, ctcr, ctbr; >>>> + int i, ret = 0; >>>> + >>>> + for_each_sg(sgl, sg, sg_len, i) { >>>> + if (sg_dma_len(sg) > STM32_MDMA_MAX_BLOCK_LEN) { >>>> + dev_err(chan2dev(chan), "Invalid block len\n"); >>>> + return -EINVAL; >>>> + } >>>> + >>>> + ret = stm32_mdma_set_xfer_param(chan, direction, &ccr, &ctcr, >>>> + &ctbr, sg_dma_len(sg)); >>>> + if (ret < 0) >>>> + return ret; >>>> + >>>> + if (direction == DMA_MEM_TO_DEV) { >>>> + src_addr = sg_dma_address(sg); >>>> + dst_addr = dma_config->dst_addr; >>> >>> and this seems correct, but then why are we doing it in >>> stm32_mdma_set_xfer_param() >>> >> >> See comment above. >> >>>> +static struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *stm32_mdma_prep_slave_sg( >>>> + struct dma_chan *c, struct scatterlist *sgl, >>>> + u32 sg_len, enum dma_transfer_direction direction, >>>> + unsigned long flags, void *context) >>> >>> right justfied these please, it makes a terrible read >>> >> >> Given the amount of parameters difficult to right align. >> Agree with this formatting ? >> >> static struct dma_async_tx_descriptor >> *stm32_mdma_prep_slave_sg(struct dma_chan *c, struct scatterlist *sgl, >> u32 sg_len, enum dma_transfer_direction direction, >> unsigned long flags, void *context) > > Yes looks much better :) > Good :) >>>> +static int stm32_mdma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >>>> +{ >>>> + struct stm32_mdma_chan *chan; >>>> + struct stm32_mdma_device *dmadev; >>>> + struct dma_device *dd; >>>> + struct device_node *of_node; >>>> + struct resource *res; >>>> + u32 nr_channels, nr_requests; >>>> + int i, count, ret; >>>> + >>>> + of_node = pdev->dev.of_node; >>>> + if (!of_node) >>>> + return -ENODEV; >>>> + >>>> + ret = of_property_read_u32(of_node, "dma-channels", &nr_channels); >>>> + if (ret) >>>> + nr_channels = STM32_MDMA_MAX_CHANNELS; >>>> + >>>> + ret = of_property_read_u32(of_node, "dma-requests", &nr_requests); >>>> + if (ret) >>>> + nr_requests = STM32_MDMA_MAX_REQUESTS; >>> >>> wouldn't it make sense to print error about these properties not being >>> present and continuing w/ defaults..? >> >> Those are optional parameters as stated by bindings. I can print out a warning >> or info if you'd like but not error. > > Are these mandatory properties or optional. In case of latter warn should > suffice. > optional. Let pick out warn then. Thanks��.n��������+%������w��{.n����z�{��ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f