Hi, On Mon, 2017-07-17 at 11:27 +0200, Martin Blumenstingl wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 9:21 AM, Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, > > On Sat, 2017-07-15 at 14:11 +0200, Martin Blumenstingl wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 11:33 AM, Chunfeng Yun > >> <chunfeng.yun@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > Hi Martin, > >> > > >> > On Thu, 2017-07-13 at 12:59 +0200, Martin Blumenstingl wrote: > >> >> This series is the outcome of a discussion with Felipe Balbi, > >> >> see [0] and [1]. > >> >> The quick-summary of this is: > >> >> - dwc3 already takes one USB2 and one USB3 PHY and initializes these > >> >> correct > >> >> - some other HCI platform drivers (like ehci-platform.c, xhci-mtk.c and > >> >> ohci-platform.c) do not have a limitation on the number of PHYs - they > >> >> support one PHY per actual host port > >> >> - Amlogic Meson GXL and GXM SoCs come with a dwc3 IP block which has two > >> >> or three USB2 ports enabled on the internal root-hub. The SoCs also > >> >> provide separate USB2 PHYs, one per port. All USB2 PHYs (which are > >> >> internally "connected" to the dwc3 roothub) need to be powered on, > >> >> otherwise USB devices cannot be enumerated (even if just one PHY is > >> >> disabled and if the device is plugged into another, enabled port) > >> >> > >> >> In my first attempt to get USB supported on the GXL and GXM SoCs I tried > >> >> to work-around the problem that I could not pass multiple PHYs to the > >> >> dwc3 controller. > >> >> This was rejected by Rob Herring (which was definitely the thing to do in > >> >> my opinion), see [2] > >> >> > >> >> This series adds a new "platform-roothub". This can be configured through > >> >> devicetree by passing a child-node with "reg = <0>" to the USB > >> >> controller. Additionally there has to be a child-node for each port on > >> >> the root-hub. Each of the child-nodes takes a "phys" and "phy-names" > >> >> property. This allows modeling the root-hub in devicetree similar to the > >> >> USB device binding (documented in devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-device.txt) > >> >> This avoids and backwards-compatibility problems (which was a concern > >> >> regardless of the solution, see [3]) since the binding for the root-hub > >> >> was previously not specified (and we're not using the "phys" property of > >> >> the controller, which might have served different purposes before, > >> >> depending on the drivers). > >> >> > >> >> Additionally this integrates the new platform-roothub into xhci-plat.c > >> >> which automatically enables it for the dwc3 driver (in host-mode). > >> >> > >> > How to handle the phy0(one u2phy and one u3phy) when port1 support > >> > dual-role mode? leave them to peripheral side as felipe suggested > >> > before? If so, no port1 node for roothub, is there any problem when > >> > change the port1 to host-only mode? > >> on Amlogic Meson GXL we have the following IP blocks: > >> - 2x USB2 PHYs, some external component has to tell them which mode > >> (host/device) they should operate in > >> - there is an additional (1x) USB3 PHY with built-in OTG detection logic > >> > >> on Amlogic Meson GXL it could work like this: > >> USB2 and USB3 phy0 can be passed to the root-hub. Additionally the > >> USB2 phy0 could be passed to the USB3 PHY. The USB3 PHY would then > >> tell the USB2 PHY in which mode it should operate. > >> > >> please note that device mode and OTG support on Amlogic Meson GXL is > >> more complicated, as it uses dwc2 and dwc3 controllers in combination: > >> - dwc3 is reponsible for host-only mode > >> - dwc2 is responsible for device-only mode > >> - OTG detection is done by the USB3 PHY > >> > >> would you mind sharing a short overview of host/device/OTG support > >> works on Mediatek SoCs? I assume that the Amlogic Meson GXL > >> implementation is quite special, so comparing this with another > >> implementation (for example the Mediatek one) may help spotting > >> potential issues. > >> > > MTK's mtu3 IP supports at most 5x USB2 phys and 4x USB3 phys. They work > > as following: > thank you for sharing this! > > > 1. device mode works as HS only: > > > > u2phy0 --- dual-role/OTG > > > > u2phy1 ---| > > + U3 host-only > > u3phy0 ---| > > > > ... > > u2phy4 ---| > > + U3 host-only > > u3phy3 ---| > > (e.g. MT8173 supports 2x u2phys and 1x u3phy, u2phy0 can work as > > dual-role mode, u2phy1 & u3phy0 are host-only) > > > > 2. device mode works as HS & SS, or host only: > > > > u2phy0 ---| > > + dual-role or host-only > > u3phy0 ---| > > > > ... > > u2phy3 ---| > > + U3 host-only > > u3phy3 ---| > > > > u2phy4 --- U2 host-only > > (e.g. on MT2701, u2phy0 and u3phy0 work as host-only mode) > OK, so in both cases only one port (with one u2phy and one u3phy) is > dual-role capable Yes > > > mtu3 driver supports host-only, device-only and dual-role mode(use IDDIG > > pin), and will take all phys it needed, include host-only phys; > > But if just host-only mode is supported, we can skip mtu3 driver and > > make use of xhci-mtk driver directly, then xhci-mtk will take all phys. > I see, in your example it's the mtu3 > (Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/mt8173-mtu3.txt) which does the > mode switching. I assume that you're doing the host/device mode > switching through the extcon phandle (for example together with the > extcon-usb-gpio driver). > > in you example: can't we *always* describe the roothub via devicetree > (just like in my example: [0])? > this means that (as you already mentioned) USB host-only support is now covered. > to handle dual-role (host/device switching) we now need to pass the > dual-role capable PHYs to whatever IP can detect the mode it should > operate in (in your case: mtu3, in Amlogic's case: the u3phy with > built-in mode detection logic -> the driver for this IP block should > call phy_set_mode(phy, PHY_MODE_USB_{HOST,DEVICE,OTG} accordingly). > here's a skeleton (stripped-down) of how the .dts could look like: > mtu3: usb@11271000 { > compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-mtu3"; > ... > /* MT2701 = 2nd example, for MT8173 = 1st example we would skip > the u3phy0 */ > /* only list the dual role capable PHYs here */ > phys = <&u3phy0>, <&u2phy0>; > phy-names = "usb3-phy", "usb2-phy"; > > usb_host: xhci@11270000 { > compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-xhci"; > ... > roothub@0 { > /* includes all PHYs, including the dual role capable ones */ If here include dual-role capable phys which are also taken by parent node(11271000), will cause phy_init/_power_on them twice. it seems ok if here include host-only phys, but I need test it. If here include host-only phys, there will not be port1 for roothub node, maybe it's a problem. > }; > }; > }; > > do you think that this would work for the Mediatek SoCs? > I've seen that the phy-mt65xx-usb3.c PHY driver does not have any > .set_mode callback - I assume it's simply because it doesn't need it > (as this is either managed by the hardware/IP block internally, or > through some firmware/mailbox mechanism). Hardware can automatically switch host/device mode by IDDIG pin, but also we can manually switch them. Phy driver makes use of auto way. > > > Regards, > Mart > > [0] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-amlogic/2017-July/004305.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html