On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 09:06:25AM +0100, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
> The i.MX PWM controller supports inverting the polarity of the PWM
> output. Make this feature available in the pxm-imx driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lothar Waßmann <LW@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/imx-pwm.txt | 5 +-
> drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/imx-pwm.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/imx-pwm.txt
> index b50d7a6d..d0b04b5 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/imx-pwm.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/imx-pwm.txt
> @@ -3,8 +3,9 @@ Freescale i.MX PWM controller
> Required properties:
> - compatible: should be "fsl,<soc>-pwm"
> - reg: physical base address and length of the controller's registers
> -- #pwm-cells: should be 2. See pwm.txt in this directory for a description of
> - the cells format.
> +- #pwm-cells: may be 2 for backwards compatibility or 3 to support
> + switching the output polarity. See pwm.txt in this directory for a
> + description of the cells format.
> - interrupts: The interrupt for the pwm controller
>
> Example:
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c
> index 3b00a82..05461bb 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c
> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
> #define MX3_PWMCR_DOZEEN (1 << 24)
> #define MX3_PWMCR_WAITEN (1 << 23)
> #define MX3_PWMCR_DBGEN (1 << 22)
> +#define MX3_PWMCR_POUTC (1 << 18)
> #define MX3_PWMCR_CLKSRC_IPG_HIGH (2 << 16)
> #define MX3_PWMCR_CLKSRC_IPG (1 << 16)
> #define MX3_PWMCR_EN (1 << 0)
> @@ -138,6 +139,9 @@ static int imx_pwm_config_v2(struct pwm_chip *chip,
> if (test_bit(PWMF_ENABLED, &pwm->flags))
> cr |= MX3_PWMCR_EN;
>
> + if (pwm->polarity == PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED)
> + cr |= MX3_PWMCR_POUTC;
> +
> writel(cr, imx->mmio_base + MX3_PWMCR);
>
> return 0;
> @@ -155,6 +159,11 @@ static void imx_pwm_set_enable_v2(struct pwm_chip *chip, bool enable)
> else
> val &= ~MX3_PWMCR_EN;
>
> + if (chip->pwms[0].polarity == PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED)
> + val |= MX3_PWMCR_POUTC;
> + else
> + val &= ~MX3_PWMCR_POUTC;
> +
> writel(val, imx->mmio_base + MX3_PWMCR);
> }
>
> @@ -198,6 +207,17 @@ static void imx_pwm_disable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
> clk_disable_unprepare(imx->clk_per);
> }
>
> +static int imx_pwm_set_polarity(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> + enum pwm_polarity polarity)
> +{
> + struct imx_chip *imx = to_imx_chip(chip);
> +
> + dev_dbg(imx->chip.dev, "%s: polarity set to %s\n", __func__,
> + polarity == PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED ? "inverted" : "normal");
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static struct pwm_ops imx_pwm_ops = {
> .enable = imx_pwm_enable,
> .disable = imx_pwm_disable,
> @@ -209,6 +229,7 @@ struct imx_pwm_data {
> int (*config)(struct pwm_chip *chip,
> struct pwm_device *pwm, int duty_ns, int period_ns);
> void (*set_enable)(struct pwm_chip *chip, bool enable);
> + unsigned output_polarity:1;
> };
>
> static struct imx_pwm_data imx_pwm_data_v1 = {
> @@ -219,6 +240,7 @@ static struct imx_pwm_data imx_pwm_data_v1 = {
> static struct imx_pwm_data imx_pwm_data_v2 = {
> .config = imx_pwm_config_v2,
> .set_enable = imx_pwm_set_enable_v2,
> + .output_polarity = 1,
> };
>
> static const struct of_device_id imx_pwm_dt_ids[] = {
> @@ -271,6 +293,26 @@ static int imx_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return PTR_ERR(imx->mmio_base);
>
> data = of_id->data;
> + if (data->output_polarity) {
> + const struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> + u32 num_cells;
> +
> + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "PWM supports output inversion\n");
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "#pwm-cells", &num_cells);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "missing property '#pwm-cells'\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> + if (num_cells == 3) {
> + imx_pwm_ops.set_polarity = imx_pwm_set_polarity;
> + imx->chip.of_xlate = of_pwm_xlate_with_flags;
> + } else if (num_cells != 2) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "'#pwm-cells' must be <2> or <3>\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + imx->chip.of_pwm_n_cells = num_cells;
> + }
Can't this be done in the PWM core? Right now the PWM core checks for
of_pwm_n_cells before calling ->of_xlate. IMO this check should be done
in the of_xlate hook. Then of_pwm_simple_xlate and
of_pwm_xlate_with_flags can be merged into something like:
static struct pwm_device *
of_pwm_simple_xlate(struct pwm_chip *pc, const struct of_phandle_args
*args)
{
struct pwm_device *pwm;
int ret;
if (pc->of_pwm_n_cells < 2)
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
if (args->args[0] >= pc->npwm)
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
pwm = pwm_request_from_chip(pc, args->args[0], NULL);
if (IS_ERR(pwm))
return pwm;
if (pc->of_pwm_n_cells >= 3) {
if (args->args[2] & PWM_POLARITY_INVERTED)
ret = pwm_set_polarity(pwm, PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED);
else
ret = pwm_set_polarity(pwm, PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL);
if (ret)
return ret;
}
pwm_set_period(pwm, args->args[1]);
return pwm;
}
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
