Hi, On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 10:38:38AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 3:31 AM, Maxime Ripard > <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 11:48:00PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > >> On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 10:05 PM, Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 02:30:16PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > >> >> The explanation for the endpoint ID numbering scheme is convoluted > >> >> and hard to understand. > >> >> > >> >> This patch aims to improve the readability of it by combining the > >> >> existing two paragraphs, while also providing a diagram example, > >> >> and how endpoints should be numbered based on that example. > >> >> > >> >> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@xxxxxxxx> > >> >> --- > >> >> > >> >> Hope this helps. I'm not sure I can improve this even more without > >> >> spelling out all cases. > >> >> > >> >> --- > >> >> .../bindings/display/sunxi/sun4i-drm.txt | 36 ++++++++++++++++------ > >> >> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > >> > > >> > Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> Maxime, this patch seems to have fallen through the cracks. > >> > >> Could you queue it as a fix for 4.13? > > > > Sorry, I don't know why I overlooked it. > > > > Is it really 4.13 material though? It doesn't look that urgent. > > Unless I'm mistaken, this clarifies the numbering scheme introduced > in 4.13. I'd say that's enough reason to have it in the same release. > > But I should update the diagram first. The backend <-> TCON mux is > missing. And maybe a Fixes tag. If it's just clarification, I don't think we should push it as a fix, but and it can definitely wait. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
