On 07/06, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> @@ -1231,12 +1237,18 @@ static int arm_smmu_map(struct iommu_domain *domain, unsigned long iova,
> static size_t arm_smmu_unmap(struct iommu_domain *domain, unsigned long iova,
> size_t size)
> {
> - struct io_pgtable_ops *ops = to_smmu_domain(domain)->pgtbl_ops;
> + struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = to_smmu_domain(domain);
> + struct io_pgtable_ops *ops = smmu_domain->pgtbl_ops;
> + size_t ret;
>
> if (!ops)
> return 0;
>
> - return ops->unmap(ops, iova, size);
> + pm_runtime_get_sync(smmu_domain->smmu->dev);
Can these map/unmap ops be called from an atomic context? I seem
to recall that being a problem before.
> + ret = ops->unmap(ops, iova, size);
> + pm_runtime_put_sync(smmu_domain->smmu->dev);
> +
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static phys_addr_t arm_smmu_iova_to_phys_hard(struct iommu_domain *domain,
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
