On 06-07-2017 21:30, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: > On 07/06/2017 12:24 PM, Jose Abreu wrote: >>>> +- edid-phandle: phandle to the EDID handler block. >>> Could you make this property optional and when it is missing assume that device >>> corresponding to the parent node of this node handles EDID? This way we could >>> avoid having property pointing to the parent node. >> Hmm, this is for the CEC notifier. Do you mean I should grab the >> parent device for the notifier? This property is already optional >> if cec is not enabled though. > > Yes, device associated with the parent node. Something like: > > - edid-phandle - phandle to the EDID handler block; if this property is > not specified it is assumed that EDID is handled by device described > by parent node of the HDMI RX node > > Not sure if it is any better than always requiring edid-phandle property, > even when it is pointing to the parent node. We would need a DT maintainer's > opinion on that. I will change and resend. I also have to fix a kbuild error when cec is not enabled. Best regards, Jose Miguel Abreu > > -- > Thanks, > Sylwester -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
