On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 10:21:24PM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> This patch adds documentation for the platform-level interrupt
> controller (PLIC) found in all RISC-V systems. This interrupt
> controller routes interrupts from all the devices in the system to each
> hart-local interrupt controller.
>
> Note: the DTS bindings for the PLIC aren't set in stone yet, as we might
> want to change how we're specifying holes in the hart list.
>
> Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../bindings/interrupt-controller/riscv,plic0.txt | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 63 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/riscv,plic0.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/riscv,plic0.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/riscv,plic0.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..b51a948d9acc
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/riscv,plic0.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
> +RISC-V Platform-Level Interrupt Controller (PLIC)
> +-------------------------------------------------
> +
> +The RISC-V supervisor ISA specification allows for the presence of a
> +platform-level interrupt contrellor (PLIC). The PLIC connects all external
> +interrupts in the system to all hart contexts in the system, via the external
> +interrupt source in each hart's hart-local interrupt controller (HLIC). A hart
> +context is a priviledge mode in a hardware execution thread. For example, in
> +an 4 core system with 2-way SMT, you have 8 harts and probably at least two
> +priviledge modes per hart; machine mode and supervisor mode.
> +
> +Each interrupt can be enabled on per-context basis. Any context can claim
> +a pending enabled interrupt and then release it once it has been handled.
> +
> +Each interrupt has a configurable priority. Higher priority interrupts are
> +serviced firs. Each context can specify a priority threshold. Interrupts
s/firs/first/
> +with priority below this threshold will not cause the PLIC to raise its
> +interrupt line leading to the context.
> +
> +While the PLIC supports both edge-triggered and level-triggered interrupts,
> +interrupt handlers are oblivious to this distinction and therefor it is not
> +specific in the PLIC device-tree binding.
s/specific/specified/
Quite a few typos in your series. Please spell check your stuff so I
don't have to.
> +
> +FIXME: I'm going to see if it's viable to change this.
> +On RISC-V systems there is no physical hart ID availiable to programs running
> +in supervisor mode, only a logical hart ID that is set by the bootloader. As
> +such, hart contexts are expected to be mostly contiguous.
How does this affect the binding? Or if this changes, how will it change
the binding?
> +
> +Required properties:
> +- compatible : "riscv,plic0"
> +- #address-cells : should be <0>
> +- #interrupt-cells : should be <1>
> +- interrupt-controller : Identifies the node as an interrupt controller
> +- reg : Should contain 1 register range (address and length)
> +- riscv,ndev : Specifies the maximum number of devices this PLIC is capable of
> + recieving interrupts from. While this may usually be the same as the number
> + of devices the PLIC is actually connected to, there may be fewer devices
> + actually connected. Software can be largely oblivious of this, as devices
> + that are not connected will never fire an interrupt.
We generally don't have this sort of property for irqchips because of
the reason in the last sentence. So drop this.
> +- interrupts-extended : Specifies which contexts are connected to the PLIC,
> + with "-1" specifying that a context is not present.
> +
> +Example:
> +
> + plic: interrupt-controller@c000000 {
> + #address-cells = <0>;
> + #interrupt-cells = <1>;
> + compatible = "riscv,plic0";
> + interrupt-controller;
> + interrupts-extended = <
> + &cpu0-intc 11
> + &cpu1-intc 11 &cpu1-intc 9
> + &cpu2-intc 11 &cpu2-intc 9
> + &cpu3-intc 11 &cpu3-intc 9
> + &cpu4-intc 11 &cpu4-intc 9>;
> + reg = <0xc000000 0x4000000>;
> + riscv,ndev = <10>;
> + };
> +
> +While the RISC-V ISA doesn't specify a memory layout for the PLIC, the
> +"riscv,plic0" device is a concrete implementation of the PLIC that contains a
> +specific memory layout. More details about the memory layout of the
> +"riscv,plic0" device can be found as a comment in the device driver.
Move this above required properties. Is there not a reference manual or
something that's not kernel dependent? Bindings need to stand on their
own without the kernel.
Is "0" the best you can come up with for the specific implementation?
Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
