On Thu, 29 Jun 2017, Mike Looijmans wrote:
On 28-06-17 19:02, Tom Levens wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jun 2017, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 05:29:38PM +0200, Tom Levens wrote:
> >
> [ ... ]
>
> > >
> > > > Whatever happened to this patch though? It didn't make it to
> > > > mainline,
> > > > otherwise I'd have found it sooner...
> > > >
> > > I'll have to look it up, but I guess I didn't get an updated
> > > version.
> >
> > As far as I remember I had a working V3 of this patch, but it is
> > entirely
> > possible that it was never submitted as I have been busy with other
> > projects
> > recently. I'll dig it out and check that it is complete.
> >
> FWIW, I don't see it at
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-hwmon/list/?submitter=171225&state=*
>
> Maybe you were waiting for a reply from Rob. Either case, it might make
> sense to only provide valid modes, ie to abstract the mode bits from the
> hardware, such as
>
> 0 - internal temp only
> 1 - Tr1
> 2 - V1
> 3 - V1-V2
> 4 - Tr2
> 5 - V3
> 6 - V3-V4
> 7 to 14 - per bit 0..2
>
> Guenter
>
You are right, there was still an open question about how best to handle
the mode selection in DT.
In the latest version of my patch I have it implemented as an array for
setting the two values, for example:
lltc,meas-mode = <7 3>;
This sets bits [2..0] = 7 and [4..3] = 3. Of course these could be split
into two DT properties, but I was unsure what to name them as both fields
are called "mode" in the datasheet and "mode-43"/"mode-20" (or similar) is
ugly.
With regards to your proposal, it is not clear to me whether the modes
which have the same result are exactly equivalent. Does disabling a
measurement with the mode[4..3] bits really leaves the part in a safe
state for all possible HW connections? With this doubt in my head, I would
prefer to keep the option available to the user to select any specific
mode. But I am open to suggestions.
Mike, if you would like to test it, the latest version of my code is here:
https://github.com/levens/ltc2990/blob/dev/drivers/hwmon/ltc2990.c
I pulled your patches, added two lines to the devicetree and it works fine,
I'm seeing plausible results:
root@topic-miami:/sys/class/hwmon# grep . */*
hwmon0/name:battery-gauge
hwmon0/temp1_input:291700
hwmon1/in0_input:3258
hwmon1/in1_input:1824
hwmon1/in2_input:1916
hwmon1/in3_input:1512
hwmon1/in4_input:2066
hwmon1/name:ltc2990
hwmon1/temp1_input:28062
hwmon1/uevent:OF_NAME=ltc2990
hwmon1/uevent:OF_FULLNAME=/gpios-i2c@50/ltc2990@4c
hwmon1/uevent:OF_COMPATIBLE_0=lltc,ltc2990
hwmon1/uevent:OF_COMPATIBLE_N=1
hwmon2/curr1_input:1825
hwmon2/curr2_input:349
hwmon2/in0_input:3244
hwmon2/name:ltc2990
hwmon2/temp1_input:31500
hwmon2/uevent:OF_NAME=ltc2990
hwmon2/uevent:OF_FULLNAME=/gpios-i2c@52/ltc2990@4C
hwmon2/uevent:OF_COMPATIBLE_0=ltc2990
hwmon2/uevent:OF_COMPATIBLE_N=1
As you can see, two ltc2990 on two busses, one measuring current and one
measuring 4 independent voltages.
I also like your implementation of the mode setting better, it's much simpler
than mine. And you've solved a bug in the temperature reading as well.
Excellent, I am glad it also works for you! In this case, I would propose
that I submit the V3 of the patch for further discussion.
Thanks,
Kind regards,
Mike Looijmans
System Expert
TOPIC Products
Materiaalweg 4, NL-5681 RJ Best
Postbus 440, NL-5680 AK Best
Telefoon: +31 (0) 499 33 69 79
E-mail: mike.looijmans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Website: www.topicproducts.com
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
